… They ain't got nothin' in the world these days:
-
It's been almost 50 years since Martin Luther King Jr.
dreamed of a day
when his kids would not
be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their
character. It was probably the single most inspirational
and aspirational thing he ever said. The New York Times demonstrates
that we ain't there yet, and have no particular plans or desire
to do so:
The federal Department of Education would categorize Michelle López-Mullins — a university student who is of Peruvian, Chinese, Irish, Shawnee and Cherokee descent — as “Hispanic.” But the National Center for Health Statistics, the government agency that tracks data on births and deaths, would pronounce her “Asian.” And what does Ms. López-Mullins’s birth certificate from the State of Maryland say? It doesn’t mention her race.
Jim Crow used to rely on racial classification for its purposes; the article recounts how today's bureaucrats, politicians, and race hustlers rely on it for theirs.Ms. López-Mullins, as a college student, has filled out countless nosy forms demanding that she disclose not the content of her character, but the color of her skin. And she knows it's not for her benefit.
“It’s always, ‘How can these multiracial individuals best benefit us? What category can we put them in to fulfill something?’ ” she said. “I figure there’s such a large margin of error with that kind of ridiculous accounting anyway, I’m totally against it.”
Good for her.For years, when asked her race, she checked everything that applied: Hispanic, Asian, white and Native American. And if she is now confronted with a blank space for her race, she might challenge the form with a question of her own: “What does this tell you?”
-
Also obsessed with skin color is Oscar winning Halle Berry, who's
engaged in a custody battle with a somewhat paler person that she
never got around to marrying, Gabriel Aubry. Concerning their
two-year-old daughter Nahla, Ms. Berry is quoted as saying:
"I feel she's black. I'm black and I'm her mother, and I believe in the one-drop theory," Berry said in an interview with Ebony magazine.
The folks at ABC News helpfully add the source of this "theory":The "one-drop" rule refers to Jim Crow laws passed in the South during the 20th century to further disenfranchise African Americans.
Pun Salad judges the content of Ms. Berry's character to be sub-par, but hopes Nahla will turn out OK. -
There's P.J. O'Rourke content at the Weekly
Standard, where he muses the liberals' likely next steps after
gun control:
People must be held accountable for their actions, whether with guns, knives, fists, or votes for enormous expansion of government power. As to guns, at least, this accountability is a matter of law. The law is—in a country that probably has more guns than liberals—difficult to enforce. But most laws are. Otherwise we wouldn’t have to make them laws. So why are liberals obsessed with guns in particular? And why do liberals feel compelled to vociferously argue empty truisms about guns?
Pun Salad dimly remembers being a young man, and it was not a pleasant experience for either Pun Salad or anyone in Pun Salad's immediate vicinity. Searching for "young man" on Google News brings up the following (as I type):Because liberals are opposed to violence, which is very high-minded of them. Guns are a source of violence in America. Guns are not, however, the principal source. Young men are the principal source of violence in America. This is why it’s only a matter of time before liberals—being opposed to violence—propose young man control.
- "Young man rushed to hospital after shooting in Scarborough…"
- "A suspect is in custody for a double stabbing on an MBTA bus last year that left one young man dead and another injured…"
- "Young man, 19, killed in Bunbury motorbike crash…"
- "Young man gunned down outside apartment…"
- "A young man who held hostages in a bank for 3 hours Thursday in Cary, NC, was shot dead by police snipers…"