Although I know all the cool kids use Netflix, I've been a customer of Blockbuster Online for awhile. I have a hopelessly long queue, both movies and TV shows. I can, of course, move things up and down in the queue.
I started wondering if there was some way I could optimize the queue. All the movies have ratings at the Internet Movie Database (IMDB); most also have ratings at Rotten Tomatoes (RT).
Hm.
So I did the Statistics 101 thing, aided by some Perl web-crawling scripting and Gnuplot: a scatter plot for each movie in my queue that had both an IMDB rating and a RT rating. (click to embiggen):
I've seen worse data! They look kind of correlated, so let's also put in the linear best-fit line:
Looks almost like science! For anyone who knows what "correlation coefficient" means: it's 0.79 for this data.
Some miscellaneous observations:
-
The data should not be taken to represent anything general
about IMDB and RT ratings. For example, I've either
already seen, or decided I don't want to see, very high-rated movies.
Similarly, there aren't a lot of dreadful movies in the queue.
So the movies in the data aren't necessarily representative of movies
in general
-
RT advertises their "Tomatometer" ratings prominently, but I
used their fine-print "Average Rating" instead. The Tomatometer
is (roughly) the fraction of critics who liked the movie; the Average
Rating is more comparable to what IMDB does: each movie gets a score
between 0-10.
-
Fun facts: although IMDB rates movies from 1-10,
there are only two
movies at IMDB with ratings greater than 9: The Shawshank
Redemption and The Godfather.
And there are only 38
movies with ratings under 2. I'm pretty sure the lowest-IMDB-rated movie
I've ever watched is Epic Movie, which
has a 2.2.
-
The movie up there in the northeast corner of the plot is The
General, a silent Buster Keaton movie from 1927. It gets an
8.3 at IMDB and an 8.8 at RT.
I'll move that up in the queue.
-
Down there in the southwest corner with IMDB ratings under 5.5 and
RT ratings under 5.0: M. Night Shyamalan's The Happening;
The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor; and Balls of Fury
(the ping-pong comedy with Christopher Walken). Maybe I shouldn't
bother with those, at least not until I've seen every other better
movie.
-
Somewhat interesting are the outliers: Eagle Eye was relatively
despised
by the critics (RT
rating: 4.6) but the rankers at IMDB didn't think it was that
bad, giving it a 6.8.
(In the same boat: War, with Jason Stethem and Jet Li, 6.2 at
IMDB, 3.9 at RT.)
The other way around: the RT critics adored Sidekick, a direct-to-DVD underperformer (7.3 Average Rating, 100% on the Tomatometer). But the IMDBers were like, eh!, giving it a mediocre 5.7.
Not sure what to do with those.