A neat little case study in How Things Really Work: At Cato, Daniel Griswold posts on efforts to repeal the "Shoe Tax", the tariff on imported footwear. Fun Facts:
-
The tariff dates from Depression days.
-
Meant (as these things always are) to protect domestic producers
from foreign competition, that battle was lost long ago: "99 percent of
shoes sold in the United States are imported." But the tariff keeps
jogging (heh) along even after its rationale has evaporated.
-
U.S. shoe tariffs are among the highest in the world.
-
The tariff is highly regressive; its primary impact is on cheap
shoes, the ones lower-income Americans are likely to buy.
-
Is this outrageous tax being opposed by consumer activists and champions
of the poor? Uh, no. Griswold quotes a Chicago Tribune story:
the lobbying is coming from well-heeled
"trade associations and their members,
such as Payless ShoeSource, Nike Inc. and Columbia Sportswear Co."
Yes, greedy soleless corporations are stepping up to actually do
something to help the downtrodden; conversely, the usual
self-proclaimed advocates of the less advantaged, a slippery bunch,
aren't shoeing
up at all.
-
Yes, that's way too many puns, even for Pun Salad. I'll stop now.
-
There's a website devoted to ending the tariff: EndtheShoeTax.org.
-
Legislation has been introduced in the House (HR 3934)
and Senate (S
2372). So far, the co-sponsors seem a bipartisan bunch; this isn't a
wedge issue.
You might want to drop a note to your representatives;
threaten to boot them out of office if they don't support it.
Demand to know their platform, and whether they can stop the bill from being
clogged up in a committee. Don't let them flip-flop;
we pay their salaries, so they shouldn't be
loafers.
And don't be reluctant to pump up their egos a bit.
-
Sorry. I'll really stop.
What to keep in mind: this is only happening due to corporate lobbying and the mere fact that the tariff is egregiously outrageous and indefensible. Multiply by dozens of similar cases that don't have the lobbying clout. As Griswold points out, there are plenty of other tariffs that hit the poor the hardest, while "protecting" the relatively wealthy from competition. He sums up:
The political irony here is that many of the same people who complain the loudest that the rich are not paying their "fair share" of income taxes are the first to oppose any lowering of regressive trade barriers that make it more difficult for poor parents to feed and clothe their children.It's enough to make one want to vote for Ron Paul. Uh, almost.